CWRUnet Task Force | Summary of "From A Student Perspective" |
From A Student Perspective:
Summary of the CWRUnet Task Force report
Why CWRUnet?
When CWRUnet was created in 1988, the engineers, managers, and technicians who
designed it attempted to build the best, most revolutionary, technologically
advanced network in the country. In many ways, they were very successful.
However, today – now nine years later – many students and faculty are left
confused and frustrated by the administration’s goals for this revolutionary
network. There can be no question that this University is now completely
dependent upon CWRUnet. Many courses employ CWRUnet as part of the means for
completing coursework. The University uses CWRUnet heavily as a recruiting
tool. Furthermore, the vast resources available via the network’s connection
to the Internet complement this institution’s mission quite well. This network
must remain fully functional and visionary if the University wishes to remain
competitive among other educational institutions.
What services should be provided?
In order for CWRUnet to provide the best possible service, making it the
visionary network that it should be, a few important items are needed. To begin
with, students and faculty now rely upon the network to such an extent that
dependable, reliable access is of major importance. CWRUnet cannot realize its
fullest potential as a powerful resource unless each and every user can
fully depend upon it. Secondly, and more importantly, the network needs to
contain valuable information that students and faculty can and will want to
access. With the many resources from across campus available on CWRUnet, users
will save time and energy locating needed information. There needs to be a
concerted effort in this area to provide these resources online, as it
were. Finally, it is important to remember that some of the users of CWRUnet
are not as computer savvy as others. Though the network is a wonderful
teaching tool in and of itself, without the proper technical support and
documentation it becomes exceedingly frustrating and complex. The University
needs to ensure that effective, relevant technical support and help is readily
available to all of its users.
How can CWRUnet provide these services?
The CWRUnet staff has done a fairly good job implementing their original goals,
but unfortunately it may be time to rethink the purposes behind them. As
previously stated, the University needs to be fully committed toward making the
network as reliable and dependable as possible. To achieve this, it may be
necessary to implement a progressive plan of action – this plan might include
such goals as installing backup equipment, providing 24 hour monitoring of the
network, and more rigorous testing of new components before they are
installed. (These are just examples, a more detailed analysis is covered in the
RHA/USG document.) The actual content of the network is very important as well.
To provide this, strong student and faculty input is needed, detailing what
they believe to be meaningful online resources. All possible options must be
thoroughly researched before any action is taken. The biggest mistake that
could be made, and that this committee specifically does not want to imply or
support, would be a quick solution to these issues. The final issue, that of
adequate technical support, may require a few changes. Current documentation
is needed each school year, detailing specific parts of the network,
and covering the major types of computers that are used at the University.
This should be available in a printed form, so there are no frustrating
paradoxes (students cannot access online help if they cannot use their
network). More service technicians may be needed, or a better system devised,
to help deal with the large number of problems a large network inevitably
accrues.
There are a few, final items to note. This committee’s goal is not to attach blame to any of the aforementioned problems. In fact, it is our belief that the staff that supports CWRUnet (Information Services) has one of the most difficult jobs on campus. However, the problems detailed here are very real to students and faculty alike. Timely, deliberate response is important, to maintain both Case Western Reserve University’s reputation, and to ensure the students’ well-being. As response to individual problems is important, response producing more long-term solutions would be better. Therefore, the strongest recommendation that this committee can make is that a permanent rapport be developed between students and Information Services, so students do not feel as though their problems with CWRUnet are unimportant.
CWRUnet Task Force | May 6, 1997 |
Other Formats: